Sylvain Reynard

NY Times Best-Selling Author

Happy Easter

Happy Belated Easter to all those who celebrated. I hope you had a blessed celebration.

Thank you to everyone who joined me in this year’s Lenten Read-along. I really enjoyed your comments and reflections and was glad to have your company on this journey.

I learned a lot from Sister Wendy’s remarks on each piece of art, particularly with respect to her appreciation of abstract art. There were a few surprises in her choices and I looked forward to each daily reading. She emphasized the importance of taking time to look and to appreciate each piece of art. I think her vocation as a contemplative enabled her to see what many of us would overlook or rush past.

I’m looking forward to my next visit to an art gallery so I can put into practice what I have learned.

All the best and thanks for reading,

SR

www.sylvainreynard.com

Lenten Read-Along #4

Dear Everyone,

I hope that you will join me in a chat this Saturday, April 1, at 9AM Eastern (New York). The All Things SR Podcasts hosts, Pam and Leslie, will be hosting the chat. I’m looking forward to discussing “The Art of Lent” by Sister Wendy Beckett and hearing about your favourite paintings.

You can join the chat here. It will not be live until 9AM sharp Saturday morning.

In the meantime, I welcome your reflections and comments on this week’s paintings. I’m struck by the beauty of “Diana the Huntress,” and Sister Wendy’s reflections on the nature of joyful confidence. Truly, she sees things that I do not see. I really appreciate the depth of her understanding.

All the best and hope to chat with you on Saturday,

SR

www.sylvainreynard.com

Great Museums of the World – part 1

Dear Everyone,


The Professor enjoys museums. One could argue that he enjoys them too much …

Setting aside the romantic aspects of museums, I’d like to focus on a few treasures from two of my favourites.

The first is the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence. They have one of the finest collections of Italian Renaissance art in the world, as well as a collection of Dutch and Flemish masters. The contrast between the two kinds of artwork is striking, almost jarring.

My favourite room in the Uffizi is the Sandro Botticelli room. (You can read a previous post of mine on Botticelli’s illustrations of Dante’s Divine Comedy here.) One of my favourite paintings is Botticelli’s Primavera.
However, there are two other works in the Uffizi that fascinate me. First, Filippo Lippi’s Madonna with Child and Two Angels, which is mentioned in Gabriel’s Inferno (You can read about it here.)
Second, the Annunciation by Leonardo da Vinci. (You can view a stunning image of it here.)
Another favourite museum of mine is the Prado in Madrid. There’s an extensive Spanish collection here, of course, with many European masterpieces.
Let me draw your attention to three of my favourites. First, Francisco de Goya’s moving and dramatic The Third of May 1808.
In the age of the internet, one doesn’t need to travel in order to visit the great museums of the world. Both the Uffizi and the Prado have websites that offer virtual tours. The Web Gallery of Art offers a searchable database of images, if you have a particular piece in mind and you want to know to which museum it belongs.

I also want to recommend the television series “Museum Secrets,” which goes behind the scenes at major museums. Their programs and their secrets are fascinating.

I’ll be posting about other museums later this week. You can also follow me on Twitter.
All the best and thanks for reading,


SR

Art – Fra Filippo Lippi “Madonna with Child and Two Angels”

Dear Everyone,


In one of the scenes in “Gabriel’s Inferno,” two of the characters visit the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto in order to view a visiting exhibition of Florentine art.
(Parenthetically, it should be noted that the snarky narrator does not like the recent renovations to the ROM and he says so, in his own inimitable way.)
The painting I chose to highlight in that scene is Fra Filippo Lippi’s “Madonna with Child and Two Angels,” which was painted in 1465.
Fra Lippi, (1406-1469), lived a very colourful life. After he was orphaned, he was placed under the care of the Carmelites and eventually became a friar. At the height of his career, Fra Lippi enjoyed the patronage of Cosimo de’ Medici. The Medici were, perhaps, the most powerful family in Florence. Fra Lippi’s most famous student was Sandro Botticelli.
The life of a friar did not appeal to Lippi and he caused a great scandal by running off with a nun, Lucrezia Buti. His seduction of the young and lovely Lucrezia began when he asked her to model for a painting of the Virgin Mary. Despite the attempts of her father to recover her, Lucrezia remained with Fra Lippi and bore him a son, Filippo (c. 1457-1504). Filippo the younger became the great artist known as Filippino Lippi, who was an assistant to Botticelli.

(It’s possible that Filippino is mentioned obliquely in “Gabriel’s Inferno.”)
Look at the painting. One of the first things to notice is the way in which the artist has painted Mary’s halo and veil. They’re transparent. Note also the way in which the figures are situated in layers – Mary and the Child and angels appear to be sitting outside the picture frame, while a landscape looms behind them. The figures, the frame and the landscape provide perspective and dimensionality to the painting.
But what is far more interesting is the way in which Mary is positioned. Her head is bowed in reverence.

Follow her eyes. Is she staring at her child?

No. She’s bowed in reverence and staring at one of the angels, who smiles knowingly at someone outside the painting. Perhaps he’s smiling at the artist, himself.

Why isn’t Mary looking at the Christ child?

Some have hypothesized that the model for Mary was Lucrezia, Fra Lippi’s lover, and that the model for the smiling angel was Filippino, their son. One could theorize that the reason why Lucrezia isn’t focused on the Christ child is because her true son is in the picture. Her attention and focus is on him. (I’m sure one could make much more of this by pointing out that Lucrezia eschewed the life of a nun and a nun’s attachment to Christ in order to pursue a life with Fra Lippi. Her shift in attachment is signified in the painting.)

In future posts, I’ll take a closer look at some of the literary references in “Gabriel’s Inferno.”

All the best everyone and thanks for reading,
SR

Art – Rembrandt’s “The Return of the Prodigal Son”

Dear Everyone,


As I mentioned previously, art plays a very important role in my novel, “Gabriel’s Inferno.” Without posting spoilers, I’ll simply point out that sometimes the mention of a particular painting carries with it either a back story or an element of foreshadowing.
There is a scene, for example, in which I mention Rembrandt’s The Return of the Prodigal Son. Rembrandt’s painting illustrates a story from the Bible – Jesus’ parable of the Prodigal Son, which is told in the Gospel according to St. Luke 15:11-32. There are at least two interpretations of the parable. In the most common reading, the focus is on the Prodigal, himself, and how he wastes his inheritance indulging in sin until he is humbled completely. When he returns to his father, his father welcomes him and forgives him. The second reading focuses on the Prodigal’s brother, the son of constancy. While the Prodigal is wasting his inheritance on prostitutes and indulging (no doubt) in all seven deadly sins, the son of constancy is working faithfully on his father’s farm. His reaction to the Prodigal’s return is less than warm. The story closes with his father’s admonishment to join in the rejoicing over the Prodigal’s return and not to demand rough treatment for the brother, who no doubt justly deserves it.

The parable is short but powerful and it provides a twin message for all human beings, regardless of religion: the message of forgiveness for those who seek it and the message of mercy for those who need to do the forgiving. Yes, the son of constancy’s impulse was toward justice – the just punishment of his brother’s moral failings. But it is the impulse of the father – forgiveness and mercy – that is praised in the story. Sometimes it is better to forego justice for mercy, even though such a choice is inherently difficult.

Rembrandt captures a key moment from the parable and although the painting is static, it vibrates with emotion. He doesn’t retell the story frame by frame. He chooses a single instant, but in so doing he tells you what he thinks is important in the parable.

A writer can do the same thing by including art in a novel. The artwork doesn’t have to retell the story, it only has to highlight a key message or moment. Once again, I’ll allow the readers to decide for themselves what those moments are.

The response to the release of my book has been overwhelming. Thank you. And thank you to those who are sharing the story with friends and family. I treasure book recommendations from friends and so I’m honoured that you would recommend my book to others.

All the best and thanks for reading,
SR
PS. If you’re interested, I’m on twitter. I’m also on Facebook.
Some of the readers over on Goodreads have begun a discussion group for “Gabriel’s Inferno.” Anyone can join, at any time.

Connect with Sylvain

About The Author

fluer-de-lisI am honoured to have had all three of my novels appear on the New York Times and USA Today Bestseller lists. I was a Semifinalist for Best Author in the 2011 and 2012 Goodreads Choice Awards. {More About Sylvain}

Translate »